|
|
Canadian Historic Sites: Occasional Papers in Archaeology and History No. 9
The Canadian Lighthouse
by Edward F. Bush
Apparatus: Lights and Optics
The Whale-oil Lamp
The principal handicap of the oil-fed lamp has always been the
smoking of the wick, depositing a film of soot on the lantern glazing
and so decreasing rapidly the effectiveness of the light. This
centuries-old problem was overcome in 1782 by an invention by the
Swiss, Ami Argand, of a virtually smokeless oil lamp utilizing a
circular, sleeve-like wick through and around which was a free
circulation of air, much improving combustion. The lamp, soon to be
known by the name of its inventor, was enclosed within a glass chimney
reminiscent of the coal-oil lamps used by our grandparents before the
age of hydro. The Argand burner produced a clear, relatively smoke-free
flame. By 1820 some 50 lighthouses along the shores of England and
Ireland were fitted with Argand lamps; indeed 60 years later there were
still numerous lighthouses in the British Isles so equipped.1
A further refinement and improvement of the simple Argand burner was the
multiple-wick lamp devised by Count Rumford (Sir Benjamin Thompson),
American-born scientist and founder of the Royal Institution in
1800.
Parabolic Reflectors: Catoptric Principle
The whale-oil lamp on the Argand principle was still inferior in
illuminating properties to a well-tended blazing coal or wood fire. To
remedy this deficiency, the Swedes hit upon the use of the parabolic
reflector of polished steel as early as 1738, in order to focus the
light on the required plane. At Orskar, five parabolic mirrors were
fitted with ten burners, but these initial experiments were
disappointing mainly because the lamps were not set at the exact focal
point of the mirrors.2 By 1763 a crude type of parabolic
reflector was introduced to certain lights along the Mersey in England,
but again results were not encouraging.3 It fell to J. A.
Bordier-Marcet of France to perfect what came to be known as the
"catoptric system" (from the Greek katoptron, a mirror). His
fanal à double effet employing two reflectors and two Argand
lamps won general favour in the French lighthouse service by 1819.
Bordier-Marcet's next optic, the fanal sidéral or star-lantern,
utilized two circular reflecting metal plates, one above and one below
the flame, projecting the light in a parabolic curve horizontally. In
essence, this device reflected the vertically emitted light to the
horizontal plane. Mariners at Honfleur, where the star-lantern was first
introduced, enthusiastically dubbed it notre salut. This device
increased the candle power of an ordinary Argand lamp from 10 to 70
candlepower, a seven fold improvement.4 Catoptric apparatus
was used in the Canadian lighthouse service until late in the century
because of its relative economy, but in Europe and the United States a
light upon an improved principle had largely displaced the simple
reflector type by the 1830s and 1840s.
The following passage quoted from the minutes of the New Brunswick
Executive Council in 1846, describing the apparatus at Machias Seal
Island at the entrance to the Bay of Fundy, illustrates the limitation
of the older style catoptric installations with multiple lamps and
reflectors.
The Lighthouse lanterns have eight parabolic reflectors of 23
inches diameter, set in a circle of 16 feet circumference, with one
large Argand lamp to each, each lamp having a pipe of communication with
a common reservoir in the centre, in which oil is kept fluid in winter
by an Argand lamp burning under the reservoirthe lantern is only
seven feet in diameter, so that the lighthouse keeper really has no
room for the necessary operations of feeding and cleaning, and the glass
of the outer frame is so near the lamps as to be constantly
misted.5
By contrast, the largest dioptric light of much greater power than
the above installation, 6 feet in diameter with but one lamp, was many
times more convenient to service.
Lenses: Dioptric Principle
In 1823 another Frenchman, Augustin
Fresnel, perhaps the most celebrated of all the pioneers in lighthouse
optics, introduced the first lenticular, or dioptric, lighting apparatus
in the Corduouan lighthouse located at the mouth of the Gironde River.
The principle of the dioptric (Greek dioptrikos, to see through)
system was the refraction, by means of lenses and prisms, of light on
the desired focal plane. Unlike the catoptric, the dioptric apparatus
used only one lamp or light source. At the time of the installation of
the first lenticular light in the Corduouan lighthouse in 1823, the
facility was considered second to none in the world. The cutting and
grinding of lenses called for craftsmanship of a very high order, and so
lenticular apparatus was costly, but once installed it required no
adjustment. By mid-century both refracting and reflecting elements were
combined in the one optic, known as the catadioptric system, but in
practice the shorter term continued to be used. By this time, lenticular
or refracting lens apparatus had supplanted the simpler reflector type
in most of the world's principal lighthouses.
4 Drawing of 1st Order revolving light, the type used in major
landfall lights. Note elaborate prisms required for oil lights.
(Public Archives of Canada.)
|
It will be readily appreciated that France was the leading country in
the field of lighthouse optics in the early 19th century; particularly
was this the case in the fine craftsmanship required for the production of
lenticular or dioptric apparatus. In England as early as 1831, the South
Shields firm of Isaac Cookson and Company endeavoured quite
unsuccessfully to match French quality. The turmoil in France in 1848
drove a number of refugees to seek asylum in England, among whom were
Georges Bontemps and an engineer, Tabouret, who had gained an invaluable
apprenticeship under the great Fresnel. These two fugitive craftsmen
from the continent were engaged by the Birmingham firm of Chance
Brothers, a concern which had been commissioned by the government to
manufacture dioptric lighthouse apparatus for use on the English and
Irish coasts in 1845. As a result, by 1851 Chance Brothers could boast a
product on a par with that of their French forerunners and future
competitors.6 The English firm enjoyed a monopoly in its
field for many years in Britain and its products were exported to all
parts of the world. Throughout the 19th century, until the debut and
gathering experience of the Dominion Lighthouse Depot in the early years
of this century, Chance Brothers supplied a large portion of Canada's
requirements.
As early as 1845, the imperial Trinity House had expressed a decided
preference for the dioptric type of light. This also was the trend along
the American seaboard, where their numbers increased from three in 1851
to no fewer than 310 five years later. Indeed the American authorities
announced a programme of total replacement of the old reflector-type
lights, whereas as late as the year 1860 there were but 10 dioptric
lights in service in the old Province of Canada.7 By this
date there was no doubt concerning the superiority of the dioptric or
refracting light. Expressed in terms of the percentage of light produced
reaching the bridge of a ship, the following figures are
significant:
|
open light (without reflectors) | 3-1/2% |
|
catoptric (the best) | 17% |
|
dioptric | 83% |
|
Assuming equivalent oil consumption, the dioptric apparatus emitted a
light five times the strength of the catoptric.8 Furthermore,
as previously indicated, one light source sufficed with the dioptric
system whereas the catoptric required multiple lamps. One cannot do
better than to quote a report compiled by a British engineering firm, D.
and T. Stevenson, for the Commissioners of Northern Lighthouses, about
the year 1850
It has been determined that in revolving lights, the effect of one
of the eight annular lenses, in a First Order Light, is equal to that of
eight of the largest reflectors in use; and that to produce by
reflectors to the most perfect kind the effect of Lenticular apparatus
of the best description, a lantern must be provided capable of
accommodating from fifty-six to seventy-two reflectors; an arrangement
all but impracticable.9
Dioptric lights were classified according to the internal diameter of
the optical apparatus: the largest, lights of the 1st Order, designed
for installation in landfall lighthouses, were 72-1/2 inches in
diameter. The smallest, lights of the 6th Order used as harbour lights,
were less than a foot in diameter. Lights of the 2nd Order were used in
coastal lighthouses, to be found frequently at the mouths of large
rivers or in the vicinity of dangerous shoals.10
This elaborate construction of precisely ground lenses and prisms has
survived to the present, although invariably the light source is now
electric. Current electric lamps, because their light source is so
concentrated, do not require such complex refracting optical apparatus
as their predecessors. Nonetheless, dioptric apparatus of the type
depicted in Figure 4 has continued to be used with an electric light
source at major lighthouses. As this apparatus is replaced over the
course of time, much simpler and less costly optical apparatus will be
used with comparable effectiveness.
5 1st Order dioptric revolving light in lantern. This apparatus
represents the culmination of the 19th century.
(Public Archives of Canada.)
|
The Coal-oil Lamp
Until the 1850s in British North America, lighting apparatus was
based on the Argand burner with its reservoir of sperm oil, with
variants of porpoise or fish oils in maritime regions. At going rates in
1861 of $1.69 to $1.85 per gallon, the traditional sperm oil was
expensive and likely to become more so due to the diminishing supply.
Already by the early sixties far-ranging whaling fleets operating in the
southern seas had depleted the whales. The British and French lighthouse
services had in large measure turned to the use of vegetable oils such
as colza and rape seed, which was at once cheaper and more readily
available. In 1860 John Page, in his report to the Commissioner of
Public Works, observed that Canadian experience confirmed the
superiority of colza to sperm oil. Although a larger quantity of the
vegetable oil was required to produce an equivalent effect, the cost was
little more than half that of the traditional material. Despite the fact
that lighthouses in the British and French service had converted with
few exceptions to the use of colza oil (the source for which was France
and Holland), at the time lighthouses both in the Province of Canada and
in the United States were still largely dependent on sperm
oil.11
A highly significant Canadian contribution to both the lighthouse
service and to domestic lighting in general was the distillation in 1846
of kerosene from coal devised by Dr. Abraham Gesner, a physician from
Cornwallis, Nova Scotia. Although having taken a medical degree in
London in 1827, Gesner later forsook medicine for geology, in which
field he made a major contribution to the development of lighthouse
illuminants.12 Popularly known as "coal oil," kerosene was
first tried in the early sixties in lighthouses on the upper St.
Lawrence between Beauharnois and Kingston. According to Superintendent
D. C. Smith, coal oil "afforded much better and more brilliant light
than the sperm oil."13 At a cost of a mere 65 cents per
gallon, coal oil offered the strong inducement of economy. In 1864,
Smith recommended the total conversion of all lights in his agency to
coal oil, and received the chief engineer's sanction the following year.
Mariners plying the upper St. Lawrence reported enthusiastically on the
effectiveness of the new kerosene lights.14 Although there
was no doubt but that coal oil produced both a brighter and steadier
flame with catoptric apparatus, John Page cautioned against its use with
dioptric apparatus which was gaining favour for the more powerful
lights. Coal oil used in the concentric ring burners required to produce
"the large, uniform shape and density of
flame required for lights of this class" would have insufficient
combustion to be effective.15 But for reflector or catoptric
lights coal oil provided at once a much cheaper and more effective
illuminant. Until late in the century, this older-style apparatus was
still favoured in Canada. In 1861 coal oil was introduced with excellent
results at the Father Point lighthouse on the lower St. Lawrence.
Until the advent of petroleum vapour and acetylene lamps early in the
20th century, the circular-wick burner using colza oil and the flat-wick
lamp using kerosene held sway in the Canadian lighthouse service. Figure
7 illustrates flatwick coal-oil lamps, so favoured for use with the more
numerous catoptric lights until the end of the century. The mammoth
burners were fitted with 18- and 24-inch reflectors; their kerosene
consumption ran at about double the rate of the smaller models. These
kerosene lighthouse lamps, some of which were still in service until
post-war years, remind one of the domestic coal-oil lamps which were so
much a part of rural households in our grandparents' generation. In the
main, these two basic lamp types, fitted with more elaborate refracting
and reflecting elements, saw the Canadian lighthouse service through
into the early years of the present century.
The Gas Mantle
Around the turn of the century an ingenious device utilizing a
familiar illuminant was introduced to lighting technology and survived
at some locations well into the post-war period. The incandescent oil
vapour light was first installed at L'Ile Penfret lighthouse in France
in 1898. The novel principle, trebling the power of all former wick
lamps, consisted of the burning of vaporized coal oil within an
incandescent mantle. In England Arthur Kitson perfected a lamp on this
principle which became well-known as the "Kitson burner," and by 1902
this equipment was widely adopted in the British lighthouse service. In
1921 David Hood introduced an improved mantle of viscous silk doubling
the brilliance of mantles up to that time.16 By 1904
petroleum vapour lights had captured the attention of the Canadian
authorities, not surprisingly. inasmuch as a 345 per cent increase in
candle power was claimed for the oil vapour lights compared with the
flat-wick lamp. The new lights came in four sizes ranging from 25 to 85
millimeters.17 Although the well-established English firm of
Chance Brothers was credited with producing the best quality petroleum
vapour lights at the time, an early Canadian competitor in the field was
the Diamond Heating and Lighting Company of Montreal.18 As
early as 1909 a 1st Order dioptric apparatus at the Heath Point
lighthouse, Anticosti Island, produced a brilliant light of one-half million
candlepower.19
6 Types of oil lamps used in lighthouses in the 19th century.
(Canada. Department of Transport.)
|
7 Flat-wick lamps utilizing coal oil, generally in conjunction with
catoptric or reflector-type apparatus.
(Canada. Department of Transport.)
|
8 Oil vapour lights with incandescent mantles, introduced in the 20th
century, this apparatus gave a much brighter light.
(Canada. Department of Transport.)
|
A concurrent development of the early 20th century and one to find
increasing favour with unwatched lights was that of the acetylene light.
First tried in Canada in the Father Point lighthouse in 1902, the
acetylene light was reported on favourably by mariners. It was claimed
that the range of this reflector-type light was increased
from 14 to 28 miles as a result of the conversion.20 In
1903 the department decided to convert all the kerosene lights on the
upper St. Lawrence to acetylene and tests conducted that same year
demonstrated a five-fold increase in candlepower over the former
kerosene flat-wick lamps.21 On the whole, the acetylene light
was more applicable to use in buoys than in lighthouses. The advantage
of acetylene was that it could be left untended for a period of time, a
factor which became significant in the lighthouse service at a much
later date. An untended kerosene device, the Wigham lamp, which could be
left to its own devices for up to a month at a time, was manufactured in
Dublin. The principle of this lamp, which found favour on the Pacific
coast, was that of a horizontally burning wick fed slowly over a roller,
the burner surrounded by a combustion cone and fitted with lenticular
optical apparatus.22 Although both petroleum vapour and
acetylene were to be eventually supplanted by electricity, both were in
service at scattered locations in very recent years.
Revolving Lights and Colour Characteristics
Until late in the 18th century, all lighthouses exhibited fixed white
lights. The first revolving light to sweep the horizon with its beam was
tested at Carlston, Sweden, in 1781. By 1790 revolving lights had been
widely adopted in the French and British services. Weight-driven
clockwork, on the same principle as that used in
grandfather clocks, provided rotary power until the advent of the
electric motor. The early revolving lights were restricted in size
because of frictional losses produced by the light's rollers in the
raceway; friction was overcome by 1890, with the introduction of the
mercury float mechanism, removing at one stroke the principal
restriction on the size and weight of the intricately designed
apparatus. The first such light in Canada was installed at Southwest
Point, Anticosti Island in 1831. Its beam completed a revolution
100 feet above high water every minute.23
Figure 9 illustrates the two systems of rotary gearing in common use
about the middle of the last century. The French system employed offset
gearing, and the Scottish, central. Greater stability and smoother
operation was claimed for the latter, conditions which were very
important with apparatus of great weight.24
9 Drawings of two basic types of rotary machines used in the 19th
century.
(Public Archives of Canada.)
|
Although it was early known that white light was visible at a greater
range than coloured, the desirability of colour characteristics in the
interests of readier identification was admitted. To an English customs
agent, Benjamin Milne, goes the credit for devising the first colour
characteristics in lighthouse optics. Produced by 21 parabolic
reflectors mounted on a three-sided frame, the whole rotated by means of
a vertically mounted axle. The reflectors on one of the three sides were
covered with red glass, producing a red beam periodically followed by
white. This apparatus was installed in the Flamborough Head lighthouse
on the Yorkshire coast in 1806. Light colours now used internationally
are white, red and green. White is preferred because of its range,
which exceeds that of red or green.
Light Characteristics
The trend in the early years of the 20th century was the replacement
of catoptric by dioptric apparatus, increased power in lights generally,
and the replacement of fixed with flashing and occulting lights in the
interests of easier identification. The flashing light displays its beam
for a briefer span than the subsequent period of darkness, or eclipse;
the reverse is the case with the occulting light. In order to render
identification yet more certain, combinations of flashing and occulting
sequences, sometimes with the additional feature of a colour phase, were
devised for different locations. Below are shown the characteristics of
lights that are exhibited internationally,
fixedcontinuous or steady light: little used today.
flashingsingle flash at regular intervals: duration of
light less than darkness.
group flashinga group of two or more flashes at regular
intervals.
occultingsteady light with a sudden and total eclipse at
regular intervals, duration of darkness being always less than or equal
to that of light.
group occultingsteady light with a group of two or more
sudden eclipses at regular intervals.
fixed flashinga fixed light varied by a single flash of
relatively greater brilliance at regular intervals,
fixed and group flashinga fixed light
varied by a group of two or more brilliant flashes at regular intervals.
quick flashinga light that flashes continuously more
than 60 times a minute.
interrupted quick flashingsame as preceding but with
total eclipse at regular intervals.
group interrupted quick flashingsame as above, but with
relatively longer periods of eclipse.
alternatingany of foregoing but which alter in
colour.25
10 Occulting apparatus used at
Machias Seal Island lighthouse, Bay of Fundy.
(Canada. Department of Transport.)
|
11 Mercury vapor electric light fitted
with bulldog plastic lenses. This is the apparatus most
favoured in the modern lighthouse service.
(Canada. Department of Transport.)
|
12 A 300-mm. lantern fitted with
mercury vapour light. On right is the circular screen
to produce flashes.
(Canada. Department of Transport.)
|
Electrification
Electricity for lighthouse purposes was tried first at South
Foreland, England, as early as 1858. The first electric light in regular
service was at the Dungeness lighthouse on the coast of Kent in 1862.
The results cannot have been encouraging, for both prototypes were
subsequently replaced with the reliable mineral oil lights. The
practical adaptation of electricity to lighthouse use was contingent
upon two developments; inexpensive transmission of electrical power (or
self-contained generating equipment) and the tungsten filament lamp or
bulb, the forerunners of which were too short-lived to be practical. In
Canada, hydroelectric power became readily available for domestic and
industrial use during the first decade of the 20th century and tungsten
filament lamps were on the market by 1907. Reed Point, New Brunswick,
was the first lighthouse in Canada exhibiting an electric light (1895),
but the first electrically operated light and fog alarm was established
at Cape Croker, Georgian Bay, in July 1902. The Ottawa firm of A.
Trudeau furnished the generating plant.26
Electrification continued apace in the inter-war years, and was
completed following World War II. The Commissioner of Lights for the
season 1914-15 listed a total of 23 electrically equipped lighthouses of
which 8 were in Nova Scotia, 6 in British Columbia and 5 in
Ontario.27
By 1931, electricity supplied both light and rotary power in an
increasing number of lighthouses. Known as "multi-flashing apparatus"
this equipment was first given a trial in 1930 at Musquash, New
Brunswick, and at Cranberry Island and Guion Island, Nova
Scotia.28 And so compact electric motors came to replace the
clockwork and weight mechanisms of yesteryear. Experimental work at the
Prescott depot delved into the use of cellophane to impart colour
characteristics, safety devices for the protection of optics and, most
significant for the future, the now widely used mercury vapour lamp. The
advantage of the latter, which is now recently replacing the filament
lamp, is greatly extended life, running to many thousands of hours.
Electrification of Canadian lights was completed following the Second
World War, although the acetylene or oil light has survived in some
locations.
Of equal significance in the evolution of the modern lighthouse
service at home and abroad was the introduction of the automatic, or
untended light. Gustaf Dalen (1889-1937) of Sweden, a brilliant engineer
tragically blinded in an accident early in his career, invented the
first automatic beacon lighting using acetylene, an innovation which won
him a Nobel Prize in 1912. He is also credited with the invention of the
first sun valve, a photometric device activated by light, switching the
light off once dawn had broken and on with gathering dusk. With the
passing of the years more and more lights could be left untended. The
advantage of automation, particularly with the introduction of the
automatic lamp changer, was particularly obvious for lights in remote
locations in the north. Today in Canada the function of the traditional
lighthouse keeper is being rapidly phased out in his stead is the
itinerant technician making his rounds at periodic intervals by motor,
supply ship or helicopter.
The principal post-war developments in the more than two-century
evolution of the Canadian lighthouse were the completion of the
electrification programme, introduction of radar aids to the lighthouse
service (for example radar reflectors), and the conversion of a great
many lighthouses to automatic and untended operation.
The completion of electrification in the post-war years was made
possible by the extension of hydro-electric power to regions hitherto
without it, and of yet greater significance, by the widespread
introduction of diesel generating units. By this means the convenience
and efficiency of electricity was introduced to the high Arctic. As
early as 1948, 481 of 2,469 lighthouses and navigational lights had been
electrified. At time of writing (1970) virtually all lighthouses
throughout the country have been converted to electricity, as well as a
good many buoys.29
Hand in hand with the electrification of lighthouses previously
equipped with acetylene or oil vapour apparatus went the development of
new high-intensity electric lights. Many of these were installed in the
original dioptric lens and prism apparatus; but with the much greater
concentration of electric light, very much simpler optics of moulded
glass and plastic served equally well at a fraction of the cost. In its
report for 1951, the department observed that "major high intensity
electric units established for trial service have been favourably
reported."30 The superiority of the new mercury vapour bulb
over the incandescent lamp was obvious by 1961, the advantage being a
light of higher intensity and much longer life; these much smaller bulbs
lasted for two or three years, an important consideration with the trend
toward unwatched lights.31
A new, lightweight, anti-corrosive aluminum alloy lantern was
introduced in 1955. These gradually will replace the heavy cast-iron
types with anticipated lower maintenance costs.32 The xenon
light developed in Britain and Germany, one of which was installed at
Prince Shoal in 1964, produced a light of such unprecedented intensity
(32 million candlepower) that it is used only in thick fog.
Electronically operated remote control systems, developed jointly by
the National Research Council and the Department of Transport, were
designed to operate both lights and fog
alarms. The offshore Pelee Passage lighthouse in Lake Erie was the
first light station so equipped. The significance of automatic remote
control for light stations in remote locations in the far north was
obvious. A microwave control system was introduced at the Holland Rock
fog alarm near Prince Rupert in 1961.33
Conversion to electricity was more than two-thirds completed by 1961;
of the 3,054 lights in service (including buoys), 2,518 were in
automatic operation.34
Fog Alarms
From earliest times various devices had been used at light stations
to sound fog warnings in thick weather, Bells, gongs and cannon were all
tried at various times and places with varying effectiveness. It was
well known that sound transmission over water was subject to peculiar
and capricious vagaries, a signal sometimes becoming inaudible close
inshore while easily heard farther out to sea. Fog signals due to
deflection or echo often gave false bearings. Such difficulties have yet
to be resolved completely.
The first steam fog whistle in British North America was installed in
1860 at the Partridge Island lighthouse in Saint John Harbour. Mariners
were enthusiastic over the installation, consisting of an 8-horsepower
engine producing a pressure of 100 pounds per square inch and costing
£350 local currency. Its range in calm weather was established at
10 miles. The whistle was controlled by clockwork, sounding 10 seconds
in each minute.35
In 1899, a fog siren was introduced at Belle Isle halfway between
the upper and lower lights at a cost of $20,112.64. Power to drive the
air compressor was derived from a waterwheel. The signal was produced by
a double siren driven by compressed air;
the siren was located 250 feet above high water, and the air
compressor in a power house at the landing stage. The equipment was
English-made36 and, along with a somewhat similar device
known as a "Scotch siren" also of British make and in use at Louisbourg
and Father Point, gave the best results before the appearance of the
diaphone, the product of a Canadian inventor.
13 Drawing of the first steam fog alarm installed
at Partridge Island lighthouse at the entrance to Saint John Harbour,
New Brunswick.
(Public Archives of Canada.)
|
14 Stone Chance electronic fog alarm, the latest development, of
English manufacture.
(Canada. Department of Transport.)
|
Diaphone Apparatus
In 1902, J. P. Northey, a Toronto manufacturer, developed the
diaphone, a major improvement in fog alarm equipment and one still in
widespread use today. Basically a modification of the Scotch siren and
operating on the principle of a high-velocity pulsating piston rather
than a rotating drum, Northey's diaphone produced a blast of more
constant pitch for about one-eighth the power expended by the Scotch
siren.37 By 1904, diaphones had replaced the older fog alarm
equipment at most of the important light stations.
The new diaphone equipment required skilled attendants known as "fog
alarm engineers" at major light stations. This attendant shared the
keeper's meagre salary. Some lightkeepers, more versatile than their
fellows, qualified as fog alarm engineers and so could dispense with
assistance. The larger diaphones were fitted with steam-driven air
compressors, but the smaller installations were petrol
operated.38
The diaphone continued in use throughout the country, notwithstanding
the introduction of electronic aids. In 1952, engineers developed a new
resonator which greatly increased the audible range. In the mid-sixties
Canada once again contributed to fog alarm development with the
"Airchine." The Airchine was not designed to replace the diaphone, the
largest of which were unsurpassed in range. The Airchine did, however,
offer the signal advantage of economy with a signal of almost comparable
range. Its air compressors were driven by small electric motors, the
whole plant being about one-fifth the dimensions of the standard
diaphone. The first Airchine went into service in 1965.39
The electronic fog alarm, a curiously shaped structure (see Fig. 14)
of English manufacture, must be considered a major departure in the more
than a century's progress in this field. This Stone Chance apparatus has
been reported highly satisfactory in the Canadian service.
Submarine Signaling Apparatus
Submarine signaling apparatus,
an invention of A.J. Mundy of Boston and Professor Elisha Gray, was
another fog alarm system introduced at major light stations early in the
century. It was based on an underwater bell connected by cable with the
lighthouse; when sounded in foggy weather, the resultant underwater
signal was picked up by a direction-finding receiver installed in a
vessel's bow. The range of submarine signals varied between 5 and 12
miles.40 The equipment had its limitations, among which was
that very few ships were fitted with direction-finders the
Tunisian and Ionian of the Allan Line, and the Mount
Temple and Lake Manitoba, early transatlantic CPR vessels.
Nonetheless, this equipment was installed at 21 lighthouses under
contract to the Submarine Signal Company of Boston.41
Submarine signaling was quickly displaced by radio in the early
twenties.
Radio
Twentieth-century progress in communications was nowhere more
apparent than in the fields of radio and aviation, the first of which
had an early contribution to make to the lighthouse service in Canada
and throughout the world. The first wireless coast station designed for
ship-to-shore communications was established at Spezia, Italy, in the
summer of 1897. The Lake Champlain, launched in 1900 and
initially operated by the Beaver Line, was the first passenger liner
equipped with radio. Although Department of Marine wireless coast
stations were often separate establishments, some lighthouses,
particularly in the early days, combined the functions of light station
and radio coast station. In 1904, for example, wireless facilities were
installed at the Fame Point, Belle Isle, Cape Ray, Cape Race, Heath
Point and Point Amour lighthouses. By 1915, no fewer than 21 lighthouses
below Quebec were radio equipped. In the same region, Crane Island,
Money Point, Point Lepreau and Partridge Island had telephone
facilities.42 By these means, a closer check was kept on ship
movements.
Note has already been made of the eccentricities, under certain
geographic or climatic conditions, of the familiar bellow and grunt of
the fog alarm. The radio beacon installed at a number of radio coast
stations and some lighthouses used in conjunction with loop direction-finding
apparatus aboard ship was to prove a surer guide to the navigator than
the audio signal from diaphone or siren. Cross bearings, however, were
themselves subject, under certain conditions, to coastal refraction and
hence dangerously misleading. In any case, radio bearings were
considered less reliable than visual bearings on a light.
In 1923, the Lighthouse Board recommended the installation of radio
transmitter beacons at either the Cape Bauld or Belle Isle light
stations, and at Heath Point, Anticosti Island. These experimental radio
beacons had a range of about 50 miles. Initially this equipment was to
be the responsibility of the lightkeeper.43 The first radio
beacon on the Great Lakes was installed at the Southeast Shoal
lighthouse in 1927, transmitting a signal every 2-1/2 minutes on a
wave-length of 1,000 meters.44
By 1929, radio direction-finding equipment had definitely supplanted
submarine signaling apparatus. It should not be overlooked that at this
date there were 153 diaphone fog alarms in service, some of which had
been operating since 1908. Indeed the fog alarm, as a glance at the
latest list will confirm, has been far from displaced; despite the
proliferation of electronic aids, mariners still appreciate the
discordant blast of the fog horn.45 In 1929 more powerful
radio beacons of 200-watt output became available; this equipment was
installed at, or near, the Cape Whittle, West Point Anticosti, and the
Pointe-des-Monts lighthouses in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. On the Great
Lakes (never behind-hand) similar equipment was supplied to the Main
Duck Island (Lake Ontario), Long Point and the Southeast Shoal (Lake
Erie), Cove Island (Lake Huron), and the Michipicoten (Lake Superior)
lighthouses.46 The words of the Liverpool Journal of
Commerce are as applicable to the Canadian as to the British
lighthouse service.
Wireless stands as science's great contribution to safety at sea,
and future developments, so far as lighting and lighthouses are
concerned, may be of no less remarkable import than those of the last
fifty years until the time, perhaps, lighthouses as we know them today,
and as they have been known for centuries, maybe
superseded.47
This speculation, dating from 1929, has yet to be fulfilled.
|