|
|
Canadian Historic Sites: Occasional Papers in Archaeology and History No. 24
Second Empire Style in Canadian Architecture
by Christina Cameron and Janet Wright
Second Empire and Napoleon III of France
Second Empire style takes its name from the Second Empire of Napoleon
III of France. During his reign, which began in 1852 and terminated
abruptly in 1870, the emperor and his wife, the Empress Eugénie, sought
to make their court the cosmopolitan centre of fashion. It is not a mere
accident that two of the first four international exhibitions took place
in Paris during the Second Empire, in 1855 and 1867,1 the
earlier one being honoured by the presence of Queen Victoria and the
Prince Consort of England.2
Determined to establish his capital as the symbol of his power,
Napoleon III found himself a brilliant accomplice in the person of Baron
Georges Haussmann whom he named Prefect of the Seine: together they
undertook a vast programme of public works that in less than 20 years
transformed the face of Paris. In addition to strictly functional
projects such as the improvement of the sewer system and the
distribution of drinking water, they carried out broad schemes of urban
planning. Several slum districts were razed to make way for the famous
network of boulevards and wide avenues:3 parks and squares
were created to offer oases of greenery in the heart of the city.
This programme did not escape notice. Enthusiastically endorsing
Napoleon III's efforts, a contemporary American observer reported,
the present Emperor spends enormous sums in beautifying his
capital and provincial cities; old quarters have been demolished, new
boulevards have been cut through, streets widened and extended, elegant
and costly residences replace those torn down, the Louvre extended and
connected with the Tuileries, a Grand Hotel, a new Grand Opera House,
churches, and public offices; all upon a scale of magnificence
heretofore unknown, astonish the visitor at every
turn.4
In this urban renewal programme, the most significant building
the building that would become for the outside world the symbol of
Napoleon III's Paris was the New Louvre.5 The
extension of the Palace of the Louvre in the 1850s to meet the emperor's
residence in the Tuileries became the model for this architectural
fashion.
The design of the New Louvre (Fig. 2) included several features that
came to be considered standard ingredients for the Second Empire style.
There is the use of pavilions, for instance, which mask the lack of
parallelism between this wing and the older parts of the Louvre. The
mansard roof is chosen, naturally enough, to harmonize with similar
roofs on the Old Louvre and the Tuileries, Introduced in the 17th
century, the mansard roof never totally disappeared from French
architecture probably for practical reasons, since its particular form
allows for maximum use of the attic space. At the New Louvre, however,
the curved profile of the mansard roof introduced a new bombastic
element that was unlike the more restrained 17th century type. This
sculptural treatment of the roof was spiritually akin to the sumptuous
classicizing decoration of the diverse façades.
Paradoxically, in spite of the international influence of the New
Louvre, this monument had little impact on the public and domestic
architecture of Paris. Except for the Grand Hotel and the Opera, few
public buildings reflected the compositional scheme or the sculptural
richness of the New Louvre. The private residences and apartment houses
erected following Napoleon III's code (uniformity of height, roofline
and street alignment) showed Second Empire influence mainly in the use
of the mansard roof; though the articulation of the façades often
followed a grid-like pattern of horizontal and vertical divisions, the
intermediate decoration, based on a play of classical motifs, rarely
reflected the plasticity or three-dimensionality, usually associated
with the Second Empire style (Fig. 3).
To understand why the Second Empire style made more impact in other
countries than it did in France itself, it may be useful to consider
the context from which these buildings emerged. The international renown
enjoyed by Paris and the lavishness of the emperor's court were perhaps
best exemplified in the Louvre project. This grandiose undertaking
appealed to a very particular and socially conscious audience, for the
New Louvre, after all, was grafted onto a building that for centuries
had symbolized the glory of French monarchs. It is probably these
courtly associations rather than the number of Parisian buildings in the
Second Empire mode that explain why the reign of Napoleon III gave birth
to an architectural style.
|