Canadian Historic Sites: Occasional Papers in Archaeology and History No. 13
Sir Sam Hughes (1853-1921)
by Carol Whitfield
Sir Sam Hughes
Sam Hughes was a man who often seemed to be trying to serve his
country in the wrong century. With his undeniable energy and central
Ontario beliefs, he might have made an excellent Minister of Militia and
Defence in Macdonald's first government. Macdonald might have been
capable of controlling Hughes' volatile personality and putting a bridle
on his tongue: Borden never could force Hughes to behave like a minister
of the crown.
Samuel Hughes, known through out his life as "Sam," was born 8
January 1853 in Darlington County, Ontario. From his father, John Hughes
of Tyrone, Ireland, Sam acquired his strong Orange and imperialist
beliefs. These views were probably reinforced by his mother, Caroline
Laughlin, who was of Scottish, Irish and Huguenot
descent.1
1 Col. Sam Hughes, MP (Victoria-Haliburton, Ont.), July 1905.
(Public Archives of Canada.)
|
Possibly his mother's stories of her grandfather, General Saint
Pierre, Brigadier of Cuirassiers, and her two uncles, who served under
Napoleon at Waterloo,2 encouraged the boy's fascination with
war. Hughes joined the active militia when he was 13 and several years
later was mustered to guard the border during the abortive Fenian Raid
of 1870.3 He rose to the rank of lieutenant colonel
commanding the 45th Battalion on 9 June 1897.4 By that date
he had achieved such prominence in Canadian militia and political
circles that he had been offered the positions of Deputy Minister of
Militia (1891) and Adjutant General (1895). Hughes declined both desk
jobs, but he did take part in Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee
celebration on 20 June 1897, for which he received a
medal.5
The Hughes were not wealthy but they did send their son to Toronto
Model and Normal School. After graduation, he taught for a short time in
Belleville and Bowmanville before returning to Toronto to join the staff
of Toronto Collegiate Institute, where he taught English and history
besides attending the University of Toronto part-time. Hughes graduated
with a BA in 1880.6 Five years later he purchased the Lindsay
Warder, a strongly Conservative paper which he edited until
1897.
Through the pages of his newspaper, Hughes made himself and his views
known to the citizens of Victoria County. His ideas were not always
popular, but a burned newspaper office and shots at the editor did not
deter him.7 In 1891, he stood for election as the
Conservative Party candidate in North Victoria, but was defeated. A year
later he won the same riding in a by-election. From February 1892 until
his death in 1921, Hughes represented the constituency of North
Victoria, or Victoria and Haliburton as it became after the
redistribution at the turn of the century.8 In the House of
Commons, Hughes was one of the leading Conservative critics on military
and militia affairs.
Regardless of how exciting the parliamentary battle was, Hughes was
constantly restless. He offered to personally raise a corps to assist
Britain in the Egyptian-Sudanese campaign and in the Afghan Frontier
War. Both offers were declined. Because he felt so strongly that the
colonies must militarily assist England in her conflicts, Hughes went on
an extended visit to New Zealand and Australia during the winter of
1897-98, promoting colonial military assistance.9
His chance came with the Boer War. As soon as he learned that war was
certain, he offered to personally raise a corps for service in South
Africa. Unfortunately, he made the offer in an unorthodox fashion.
Instead of just offering his services to the district officer
commanding, who would transmit the offer to General Hutton, commander of
the Canadian Militia, Hughes impatiently wrote also to F. W. Borden, the
Minister of Militia and Defence, and to Chamberlain, the Secretary of
State for the Colonies. Before Hutton had an opportunity to decide on
the merits of Hughes' offer, he was being pressured to accept it by
Borden and Chamberlain. Hutton furiously accused Hughes of "irregularity
and breach of military procedure."10 Unwisely deciding not to
let the issue calm down, Hughes again wrote Hutton proffering his
services. Hutton, having decided this letter was threatening and
insubordinate, denied Hughes employment in South Africa and suggested
that any more action on the latter's part might lose him the command of
the 45th Battalion. Hughes ignored the warning. Hearing rumours that a
fellow officer was to command the Canadian contingent, Hughes wrote
Hutton attacking the possible commander, praising himself, hinting about
irregularities in the British high command and threatening
Hutton.11 Not only was this letter insubordinate, it was
appallingly undiplomatic.
Hutton, who had been called before the Cabinet three times to explain
why Hughes could not go to South Africa,12 was livid.
Probably pressure from the Cabinet was the only thing that prevented
Hutton from cashiering Hughes. Instead he demanded a public apology for
the two letters and denied Hughes permission to join the Canadian
contingent. Hughes was, however, allowed to sail with the contingent in
the SS Sardinian but, "It is to be clearly understood that this
officer does not proceed in any military capacity whatever, and will
accordingly, not wear uniform on board ship."13
As soon as he disembarked at Cape Town, Hughes hurried to register at
the Grand Hotel. Here he re-established contacts with high-ranking
British officers he had met at the Diamond Jubilee. They found him a job
as a railway transport officer.14 His next position was
assistant to Inspector General Settle on the lines of communication;
then he became Settle's chief of intelligence staff, and finally was
transferred to General Warren's staff where he served in the same
capacity as well as leading a mounted brigade in the Griqual and West
and Bechuanaland campaigns.15 It was a phenomenal rise during
a period of just eight months, but unfortunately Hughes could not keep
his pen from committing his exploits to paper. Writing to the newspapers
at home, he detailed not only his own brilliant activities but also the
failures of his superiors.16 Soon he was politely dismissed
from the battle front; he was given command of a unit returning home on
a troop ship to England.17
2 Gen. Sir Sam Hughes watching British attack at Battle of the Somme,
October 1917.
(Public Archives of Canada.)
|
The Boer War did not end Hughes' involvement in the British empire.
He had always been an uncompromising supporter of imperial federation:
the masthead of the Warder was,
A union of hearts, A union of hands, A union no man can sever, A
union of tongues, A Union of lands, And the flag British Union
forever.18
Hughes envisioned a confederation of the British Empire with the
various autonomous bodies maintaining the form of government best suited
to their individual requirements. The imperial Parliament would handle
international, financial, military and naval matters. Hughes felt that
each country within the confederation would set its tariffs but that the
imperial Parliament would be able to impose sanctions upon any country
by adding a high imperial tariff to the individual member's tariff.
Similarly each country would be responsible for its own defence but
would be duty-bound to contribute to imperial defence.19 For
this reason Hughes did not support the Canadian naval policy of the
Liberals or Conservatives. He argued that a professional navy did not
fit into his scheme of imperial militia authorized by the imperial
Parliament.20 This argument follows if a navy is used only
for offensive purposes. Such a navy, under Hughes' allotment of
responsibilities, would then be a creation of the imperial Parliament.
By denying that Canada needed a navy, Hughes denied the possible
defensive functions of a navy.
The speeches he made on imperialism and his letters to General Hutton
had amply illustrated that Hughes was opinionated, outspoken and rash.
Nevertheless Borden chose him to be Minister of Militia and Defence when
the Conservatives won the election in 1911. According to his memoirs,
Borden hesitated about the appointment but, having extracted a promise
that he would be discreet, he gave Hughes the desired
appointment.21 Hughes had strong advocates recommending him:
Clifford Sifton, Sir Frederick Borden and Hughes himself called on Sir
Robert Borden to plead the cause. However, the major factor in Hughes'
favour was probably the strong support he could muster from his fellow
Ontario Orangemen, Macquarrie, in an article on the formation of
Borden's cabinet, lists one other reason for Hughes' appointment. When
Borden was personally defeated in the 1904 election, Hughes was the
first man to offer the party leader his seat.22 If the
incident did occur, no doubt it influenced Borden's decision.
With quiet and generally competent activity between 1911 and the
summer of 1914, Hughes behaved like a minister of the crown whose sole
interest is his department. Convinced that war was inevitable, he
decided to augment the Defence Department's budget. Despite opposition
by his cabinet colleagues, the budget was increased by $3.5 million from
the fiscal year 1911-12 to 1913-14.23 Some of this money was
spent building 44 new armouries which could double as public halls. The
fourth largest of these new structures was built at
Lindsay,24 the site Hughes later authorized for the second
dominion arsenal;25 it was, incidentally, the centre of his
own constituency.
Part of the increased budget paid for the new Connaught Rifle Range
on the outskirts of Ottawa, Hughes handled all the plans for this
project26 to encourage one of his special interests. Having
served as president of the Dominion Rifle Association and chairman of
the Standing Small Arms Committee for Canada,27 Hughes was
interested in rifle accuracy which he further encouraged by free grants
of ammunition to both civilian and militia rifle
associations.28
Hughes devoted part of his time to improving the calibre of Canadian
militia officers. He held the first military conferences,29
conducted a tour of American Civil War battlefields,30 and
took selected officers to attend the annual British, French, German and
Swiss manoeuvres in 1913. This final project was undertaken because
Hughes felt that the majority of Canadian officers and men had no
experience with either battle or large numbers of troops. He encouraged
large summer militia camps so the men could become accustomed to
operating in units larger than their local battalion.31
Unfortunately not everything Sam Hughes did as minister of militia
before the war was wise. The only blunder which aroused public
attention, however, was his refusal of permission to the 65th Regiment
to carry arms in the Fête-Dieu procession in Montreal in 1914.
Technically he was right, but previous ministers had avoided irritating
French Canadian nationalist feelings by granting such
permission.32
The governor general prevented a second blunder on Hughes' part from
becoming very serious. In the spring of 1914, a Count Von Loudow
presented himself at militia headquarters as a German officer touring
Canada. Hughes decided the man's credentials were in order and answered
some of his questions until the governor general ordered a security
check which revealed that the count was a spy, sent to acquire specific
information about Canadian defences along the St. Lawrence
River.33
Hughes' biggest error was one that no one could prevent: he assumed
too much personal responsibility. A militia council of six senior
officers had been established to advise the minister, but Hughes ignored
it.34 Prior to the war this tendency not to delegate
responsibility was not too serious, but once fighting started, the
department's problems multiplied so enormously that one man could no
longer handle all of them adequately.
Probably the most significant instance of Hughes assuming too much
personal responsibility was the mobilization of the Canadian
Expeditionary Force. Detailed plans for mobilizing 20,000 men had been
made in 1911 and revised in 1912, but Hughes discarded them. To the
House of Commons he later likened his method to "the fiery cross passing
through the Highlands of Scotland or the mountains of Ireland in former
days." Ignoring the militia districts, he sent letters to unit
commanders and individuals asking them to prepare descriptive rolls of
men suitable for service overseas. These rolls were to be sent to Ottawa
where the men were to be individually selected. After four days even
Hughes recognized that this procedure was impossible. The new plans he
issued gave each district a quota of men to raise.
"In a short time," proudly declared the Minister of Militia, "we
had the boys on the way for the first contingent, whereas it would have
taken several weeks to have got the word around through the ordinary
channels....The contingent was practically on the way to Europe before
it could have been mobilized under the ordinary plan." This
disparagement of the "ordinary plan" was scarcely justified; normal
military channels of communication properly used could have carried the
warning in a matter of hours, not weeks. Indeed, once the confusion
caused by the first dramatic but irregular "call to arms" subsided, most
of the volunteers joined through existing militia units in virtually the
manner prescribed by the pre-war scheme.35
3 Gen. Sir Sam Hughes, Canadian Minister of Militia and Defence.
(Public Archives of Canada.)
|
Although many men did join through their local militia units, when
they reached Valcartier they found themselves completely realigned into
units which had no geographical base or tradition.36
Mobilization was further hindered by the fact that final selection of
the contingent was to take place at Valcartier; good men hesitated to
quit their jobs only to be turned down just before the contingent sailed
for Europe.37
As soon as he had despatched the mobilization orders, Hughes began
creating a camp to collect and train the Canadian Expeditionary Force.
The physical creation of Valcartier, the huge camp outside Quebec City,
was due to Hughes' fantastic energy. In a very few weeks, he erected out
of virgin bush a camp to house and train 25,000 men.
Confusion prevailed at Valcartier but the situation would have
gradually improved if Hughes had not interfered.
The first few days in camp was chaos. Bodies of men arrived
before arrangements were made to receive them. There were no units in
the true sense of the word, but certain bodies of men submitted
themselves to the command of individuals many of whom were subsequently
displaced by the Minister. The Valcartier Camp Staff, hindered to a
great extent by the continual presence and the interference of the late
Sir Sam Hughes, gradually formed this mob into units and
brigades.38
In his memoirs, Borden cites reports of incidents of Hughes speaking
harshly and insultingly to the officers at Valcartier in front of the
men.39 The trouble really was Hughes' desire to assume total
personal responsibility. In a speech on 15 August 1914, he hinted that
the "dearest ambition" of his life was to "lead the boys" and that he
still might "go to the front."40
Hughes' total involvement with "the boys" caused him to hurry to New
York as soon as the first contingent had sailed and race them to
England. He was on hand to welcome the troops and see them settled at
the future mud hole, Salisbury Plain. Among other details, Hughes
assured himself that there was no liquor sold at the Canadian canteens.
Eventually he was forced to rescind this order when numerous incidents
showed that a totally dry camp resulted in leaves being passed at the
local pubs.41 However, he did not reverse the order before
the men parodied an old song to commemorate his temperance attitude.
D'ye ken Sam Hughes, he's the foe of booze;
He's the real champion of the dry canteen;
For the camp is dead, and we're sent to bed,
So we won't have a head in the morning.42
Actually Hughes' presence in England was fortunate for the cause of
Canadian autonomy. When he paid a courtesy call on Lord Kitchener, he
learned that the Canadian forces were going to be dispersed among the
British units. He refused to sanction such a decision and eventually
forced Kitchener to concede that the Canadians would serve as a separate
unit.43
Hughes returned to Canada and began preparations for mobilizing a
second contingent. Again he ignored the prepared mobilization plans and
ordered recruiting by electoral district. This scheme worked in cities
which had the facilities to handle recruiting and training but broke
down entirely in rural areas. The plan lasted only one season; there
were sufficient recruits but they were poorly and unevenly
trained.44 Borden's announcement on New Year's Day, 1916,
that Canada was committed to a force of 50,000 men required a new
recruiting scheme. Eventually the government realized that their
commitment could be met only by conscription.
Hughes augmented his recruiting difficulties by the manner in which
he treated French Canadians. Beginning wisely by approaching Cardinal
Bégin over the problem of chaplains,45 Hughes' methods soon
changed.
He placed an English Protestant in charge of recruiting
propaganda. [in Quebec] and from time to time emphasized the
foolishness of this action by more mischievous
activities.46
Hughes increased French Canadian resentment by statements such as
Quebec "has not done its duty."47
As Minister of Militia and Defence, Hughes' problems were not limited
to just recruiting sufficient men; the men had to be properly equipped.
To handle the complex details of purchasing uniforms as well as rifles
and shells, a shell committee was established in September,
1914.48 Prior to this Hughes made some purchases without the
Privy Council's approval.49 The shell committee, which became
the Imperial Munitions Board, worked reasonably well. Unfortunately
Hughes was personally committed to Colonel J. Wesley Allison who,
independently of the committee, was also placing orders. Allison's
activities aroused the suspicion of the Opposition and Borden submitted
to their demands for a royal commission. He therefore called Hughes home
from one of his periodic visits to the front to answer the commission's
queries. Borden also forced Hughes to temporarily relinquish the
administration of his department during the investigation. Eventually
Hughes and the shell committee were exonerated but Allison was censored
for deceiving Hughes and the committee about his
activities.50 Hughes' reputation was damaged however, and the
Cabinet was furious; they felt that he had subjected the government to
unnecessary scrutiny. At this point Borden wrote in his diary, "It is
quite evident that Hughes cannot remain in the
Government."51
Hughes was also deeply involved in the controversy over the Ross
rifle. Although the rifle had been adopted before he became the
responsible minister, it had been selected by a Commons committee of
which he was a member. Unfortunately he was unable to consider the rifle
in a detached manner. He knew that it was an excellent target rifle and
assumed that it was therefore an excellent battle rifle, a conclusion
which did not necessarily follow. Confusing reports as to the rifle's
behaviour with different makes of ammunition tended to support Hughes'
contention that people were attacking the rifle unjustly and he strongly
defended it against the documented arguments of Gwatkin and Alderson.
Probably part of the reason Alderson was transferred from the command of
the Canadian contingent at the front to inspector general in England in
May, 1916, was because of his opposition to the Ross.52 It is
unfortunate that while Hughes and the officers argued over the
attributes of the Ross, men died because the rifle jammed Borden and
Hughes clashed finally over the organization of the Militia Department
in England.
Throughout the summer of 1916 it became increasingly evident that
the existing condition of affairs must be remedied: it was found that
unfit men were being sent from Canada; that reinforcements were being
neither sufficiently nor uniformly trained in England; that the methods
of caring for convalescent wounded, and of returning casualties to the
front when fit, were unsatisfactory; that recommendations for promotion
in the field were being unduly delayed; and that there was a growing
number of senior officers in England, stranded there when the juniors
and other ranks of their units were sent as reinforcements to France.
These failings could only be rectified by establishing an organization
through which direct and efficient control, both military and
governmental, would be exercised. The need for such an arrangement had
long been foreseen by some, but the insistence of the Minister of
Militia on devoting his personal interest to adjustment of arms and
equipment and the destinies of individuals, rather than to the
co-ordination of general policies, imposed an unreckoned indeterminate
stress upon the machinery of the War Office, and precluded the effective
employment of a responsible intermediary. Early in August, 1914, it had
been agreed that the Minister should deal with details of a military
character in direct communication with the Army Council, but the sphere
of his influence was not in fact limited by the English Channel; he
maintained continual touch unofficially with the front line troops, and
his enthusiasm impelled him to comment frequently and freely on the
tactics and strategy employed.53
The problem was that the Militia Department in Ottawa was
corresponding with the War Office and three separate individuals in
England. MacDougall and Steele had separate commands of the two Canadian
contingents in England. Completely divorced from these two officers was
an honorary colonel, J. W. Carson, whom Hughes appointed as his special
representative in England.54
Carson's terms of reference applied only to supplies but he soon came
to supercede the other two officers in authority. Eventually Carson was
deciding policy and dispensing promotions under Hughes'
direction.55 Confusion reigned; no one was sure who was
responsible for what.
In the summer of 1916, Hughes returned to England to begin
reorganizing the command structure. Despite repeated telegrams from
Borden asking for his recommendations so an order-in-council could be
issued, Hughes did not inform the Canadian Cabinet of his decision. It
was through the newspapers that Borden learned that Hughes had
established an acting sub-militia council for overseas Canadians chaired
by Carson.56 The council's decisions had to be endorsed by
Hughes in Ottawa before they took effect. Despite this delay, the
council was an improvement.
But Sir Sam's efforts to bring about a more business-like state of
affairs were doomed to failure when he chose to ignore the Prime
Minister's repeated instructions.57
Hughes returned to Canada to discover that an angry prime minister
and Cabinet had made their own plans for the organization of the Militia
Department in England. A new Ministry of Overseas Military Forces of
Canada with Sir George Perley as minister would replace the sub-militia
council.58 Hughes objected strongly, claiming that the new
ministry would rob him of all his powers. Because Borden was adamant,
Hughes finally agreed to the new ministry if his friend, the future Lord
Beaverbrook, was made minister;59 however, when Borden
announced the new ministry, Perley was named minister.
In a rage, Hughes wrote Borden a letter accusing him of planning the
new ministry behind his back.60 The letter was so impertinent
that Borden was compelled to demand Hughes' resignation. After noting
Hughes' lack of Cabinet responsibility, Borden stated,
I take strong exception not only to statements which it contains
but to its general character and tone. You must surely realize that I
cannot retain in the Government a colleague who has addressed to me such
a communication. I regret that you have thus imposed upon me the
disagreeable duty of requesting your resignation as Minister of Militia
and Defence.61
Hughes resigned 11 November 1916, ending a career which had brought
him all the glory and pomp he could desire. Although he had not been
able to assume personal command of the troops, he had visited the front
several times and taken the salute at numerous parades. He had commanded
the troops, police and firemen at the Parliament buildings fire on 3
February 1916. He had also been created a Knight of the Bath on 24
August 191562 and an honourary lieutenant general in the
British army on 18 October 1916.63
Hughes retired from public service to enjoy the relative peace of his
family at his Ottawa residence, 21 Nepean Street. However, by 1920 he
was seriously ill and in July 1921 he was moved to Lindsay, where he
died 24 August of that year.64
He was a man of great ability, immense energy, and strong
enthusiasms, but possessed of a singular aptitude for uttering the wrong
phrase at the wrong time. A man of intense egotism, he was capable of
unyielding loyalty, however mistaken, for his friends and equally bitter
hatred for those he considered enemies. Headstrong and imperious, he was
inclined to make and announce decisions without submitting them to the
Cabinet, or even to the prime minister, and he was strongly disposed to
ignore the line of demarcation between political authority and military
command. There seems little doubt that, as the war continued, the
colonel became increasingly erratic and difficult.65
|